Science Communication and Decisions: a skill companion
A small set of reusable sheets that grow one Human Endeavour idea: evidence changes nothing until it is communicated, and the way it is shared, as advice each person can act on or as a rule for everyone, shapes what people think and the policies a community sets. Print the scaffolds once and slot them into the science lessons you already teach.
What a skill companion is
Human Endeavour ideas are not a topic of their own. They grow inside the science units a class teaches all year, such as Classifying Living Things, Energy Flow in Ecosystems, Earth, Sun and Moon, Balanced and Unbalanced Forces, The Particle Model of Matter, and Pure Substances and Mixtures. So this pack is not a full term of lessons. It is three reusable scaffolds, a map of where they fit, and a short stand-alone lesson for teaching the idea on its own first.
Start here: five minutes
- Read the pairing map on the next page: it shows a piece of communicated science in each Year 7 topic.
- Print the evidence-to-decision sheet whenever a topic meets advice or a rule, and the case-study sheet once per student.
- Cut out the cards once. They are reused all year, whenever a class meets science in the news or in a rule.
- Open the free interactive unit on your board when you want a worked example of the idea.
- Run the one-page mini-lesson first if you want to teach the idea before folding it into a topic.
No science background needed
Each scaffold explains itself in plain words, and the answer sheet gives a model chain for the unit’s sun-safety evidence, the case-study answers, the card key with a reason for each, a model answer for every Year 7 topic and a quick three-level guide. In Year 6, students saw how communities use science to make decisions. The step up in Year 7 is the communication itself: how the form of a message, a slogan, a number or a rule, decides whom it reaches and what it can change, for each person and for the whole community, and how a message can mislead.
Slot the idea into your science lessons
Every science topic has evidence that reaches people as advice or as a rule. This map shows one example in each Year 7 topic, how it is communicated, and which scaffold to reach for. You do not run these as extra lessons; you fold them into the science you teach.
| When you teach | Communicated science | From evidence to decision | Scaffold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classifying Living Things (AC9S7U01) | Listing threatened species | Scientists assess each species and publish which are at risk of dying out; a listing brings protection under the law | From evidence to decision |
| Energy Flow in Ecosystems (AC9S7U02) | Fishing size and bag limits | Science on how fish populations grow and feed becomes limits on how many fish, and how small, can be kept, explained on signs and apps | The cards |
| Earth, Sun and Moon (AC9S7U03) | Daily sun protection times | The Bureau of Meteorology publishes the times each day when the UV index is 3 or above, highest when the Sun is high; schools use them to set hat rules | From evidence to decision |
| Balanced and Unbalanced Forces (AC9S7U04) | Seatbelts | Crash tests showed that a body keeps moving when the car stops suddenly; Victoria made wearing seatbelts compulsory in 1970, the first law of its kind in the world | From evidence to decision |
| The Particle Model of Matter (AC9S7U05) | Smoke and the air-quality rating | Monitoring stations measure the tiny particles in smoke and publish a rating; health advice and school decisions follow | The cards |
| Pure Substances and Mixtures (AC9S7U06) | Boil-water notices | When tests find germs in town water, the water supplier tells people to boil their drinking water until tests are clear again | From evidence to decision |
| Any science topic | A science story in the news | Ask who it informs, what rule it might lead to, and whether it misleads | The cards first |
The three moves, and the picture that backs each one
When you want a worked example on the board, open the interactive unit and use the picture that matches the move.
- Weigh what each form of message does well and cannot do: “Communicating sun safety: each way gains and gives up something”.
- Check whether a message changed what people do: “Share of people who regularly protect their skin in summer”.
- Test a claim that a published rating helps: “Does a daily air-quality index help people?”.
How the scaffolds build the idea
The evidence-to-decision sheet turns one piece of evidence into a message for each person and a rule for the community, and asks how to check each one worked. The case study follows the national fire danger ratings, redesigned in 2022 after a survey showed most people did not understand the old ones. The cards sort communications by what they do: inform a person, set a shared rule, or mislead.
Turn evidence into action
Pick one piece of evidence from our topic. Plan two ways to share it: advice that each person can act on, and a rule for the whole community. Then compare them.
| For each person: advice | For the community: a rule | |
|---|---|---|
| Form slogan, number, graph, story, sign, rule ... | ||
| The message write it as people would see it | ||
| What it could change a choice, a habit, a policy | ||
| How we would check what to count before and after |
Teacher note: the unit’s sun-safety evidence fills the sheet well as a first go; a model is on the answer sheet.
Fire danger ratings: a message redesigned
Every day in the fire season, fire agencies rate the fire danger for each district from the weather and from how much dry plant material could burn. For decades the ratings rested on science from the 1960s and were shown on six levels. One of Australia’s largest community surveys then found that most people did not understand the levels, or what to do at each one.
On 1 September 2022 a new national system began. It has four levels, each with a short action, and days that need no action show “No rating”. Behind the levels, the new system models eight kinds of vegetation instead of only forest and grass, so each rating fits its district more closely. On the most dangerous days, communities act together: in some states, schools in high-risk areas close.
| Low-Moderate |
| High |
| Very High |
| Severe |
| Extreme |
| Catastrophic |
| Moderate | Plan and prepare. |
| High | Be ready to act. |
| Extreme | Take action now to protect your life and property. |
| Catastrophic | For your survival, leave bushfire risk areas. |
What does the message do?
Cut out the cards and lay down the three grey heading cards. Sort each communication by what it does: informs a person, sets a rule for everyone, or misleads. Be ready to say why.
Teacher note: four cards go in each pile. The answer sheet lists which is which, and why.
One fact, two messages
Use this stand-alone lesson to teach the idea on its own, before you fold it into a science topic. Groups turn one piece of sun-safety evidence into advice for each student and a rule for the whole school, then swap and test each other’s messages.
We are learning to
- turn evidence into a message that suits its audience,
- tell advice for each person apart from a rule for the community,
- judge a message by whether it is true, clear and likely to change what people do.
Success criteria
- Our advice and our rule both stay true to the evidence.
- I can explain why a community might need the rule as well as the advice.
You need
- the evidence on the board: sun protection is recommended whenever the UV index is 3 or above, and in most of Australia the UV index is 3 or above for much of the year, even on cool or cloudy days,
- the evidence-to-decision sheet (scaffold 1), one per group, and the cards from scaffold 3, one set per table.
Lesson flow (about 30 minutes)
| 5 min | One fact Read the evidence together, then show the board (see the box). Ask: “Who needs to know this? What would you want each of them to do?” |
| 10 min | Two messages In each group, one pair writes advice for students (a slogan, a poster line or a daily display), and the other pair drafts a school rule with a one-line reason. Ask: “What did you keep from the evidence? What did you leave out, and is the message still true?” |
| 10 min | Test it Groups swap and score each message on three questions: is it true to the evidence, is it clear in five seconds, and would it change what people do? Ask: “Which message would reach more people? Which would change more of what they do?” |
| 5 min | Sort Tables sort the message cards under the three heading cards. Ask: “Which cards mislead, and how would you fix one of them?” |
Running it shorter? Write the advice only, and draft the rule in your next science lesson.
Watch for these ideas
- Thinking a message works because it sounds good, without checking what people actually do.
- Dropping the condition that makes the advice true, such as “when the UV index is 3 or above”.
- Seeing a rule as unfair because it is not advice: a rule also protects people who never saw the advice.
Make it easier, make it bigger
- Easier: give a sentence starter for the advice and for the rule.
- Bigger: survey another class before and two weeks after your poster goes up, and graph the results as in the unit.
Answers and look-fors
The next sheet has a model chain for the sun-safety evidence, the case-study answers, the card key, a model answer for each Year 7 topic, and a quick three-level guide.
Answers and look-fors
From evidence to decision: sun safety
Evidence: UV radiation from the Sun can damage skin, and protection is recommended when the UV index is 3 or above. Where it comes from: public health research, and the Bureau of Meteorology’s daily UV forecasts. Who needs to know: students, families and teachers.
| For each person: advice | For the community: a rule | |
|---|---|---|
| Form | a slogan, and the daily UV index | a school sun-protection rule |
| The message | UV 3 or above today? Hat, shirt, sunscreen, shade. | Hats on outside whenever the UV index is 3 or above. |
| What it could change | each student’s choice to cover up | every student is protected, including those who missed the advice |
| How we would check | survey how often students cover up, before and after | count hats in the playground on days of UV 3 or above, before and after |
1. The slogan and the daily number reach more people; the rule changes more of what students do at school. 2. Advice relies on each person choosing to follow it, while a rule protects everyone, including those who never saw the advice. 3. By dropping the condition (UV of 3 or above), by making UV sound like a summer-only problem, or by giving no source.
Case study: fire danger ratings
1. A rating protects people only if they understand it and know what to do, and most people did not understand the old levels. 2. One of Australia’s largest community surveys, which showed that most people did not understand them. 3. It turns the rating into an instruction, so no one has to work out what a level means in the moment. 4. A person: leave a bushfire risk area early, before any fire starts. A community: close schools in high-risk areas, or declare a total fire ban. 5. Gains: two fewer levels, each clear enough to remember and act on. Loses: some of the fine detail between levels. 6. Survey people’s understanding of the levels before and after the change, or count how many people acted on the advice on days of high danger.
Message cards
| Card | Pile | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A | Misleads | A big claim with no evidence anyone can check. |
| B | Informs a person | A local number each person can act on. |
| C | Sets a shared rule | A rule that applies to everyone. |
| D | Informs a person | Information each shopper can use to choose. |
| E | Misleads | The scale makes a small change look large. |
| F | Sets a shared rule | A policy that protects every student. |
| G | Sets a shared rule | Evidence turned into a law. |
| H | Informs a person | Feedback each household can act on. |
| I | Misleads | It overstates a small study that was not on people. |
| J | Misleads | One day picked out of decades of records. |
| K | Sets a shared rule | A restriction everyone must follow. |
| L | Informs a person | Explains the evidence so listeners can decide for themselves. |
For each misleading card, ask students to rewrite it so it is true: name the study, start the scale at 0, or show the long record.
What a good answer sounds like
| Topic and message | How it informs people and the community, at standard |
|---|---|
| Classifying Living Things (AC9S7U01) Listing threatened species | A clear, public assessment shapes what people think of a species, and the listing triggers laws that protect it and its habitat; without the published evidence there would be no rule. |
| Energy Flow in Ecosystems (AC9S7U02) Fishing size and bag limits | Explaining that small fish go back so they can breed first wins support from people who fish, and the limits themselves are the community rule. |
| Earth, Sun and Moon (AC9S7U03) Daily sun protection times | A daily, local time informs each person when to cover up, and the same times let a school set a rule that protects every student. |
| Balanced and Unbalanced Forces (AC9S7U04) Seatbelts | Explaining the crash-test evidence changed what people thought of seatbelts, and the law then made wearing one the rule for everyone. |
| The Particle Model of Matter (AC9S7U05) Smoke and the air-quality rating | One published rating informs each person’s choices, such as staying indoors, and gives schools a shared trigger, such as moving sport inside. |
| Pure Substances and Mixtures (AC9S7U06) Boil-water notices | A clear, fast notice lets each household act at once, and national guidelines set the limits every water supplier tests against. |
A quick three-level guide
| Move | Working towards | At standard | Beyond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fit the message to its job | writes one message for everyone | writes advice for each person and a rule for the community, each suited to its audience | explains when a rule is needed rather than advice |
| Keep it true | stretches or leaves out the evidence | keeps the message true to the evidence, with its source | spots misleading graphs and headlines, and fixes them |
| Check the effect | assumes the message worked | names what to count before and after | plans a fair check, and says what result would change the message |
A student at standard turns evidence into advice and a rule that each stay true to it, and says how to check that they worked. The idea grows all year, so keep the cards coming back whenever science reaches the news.