← Back to the unitTip: in the print dialog choose “Save as PDF”.
Skill companion · Year 7 Science as a Human Endeavourseegongsik /au

Science Communication and Decisions: a skill companion

A small set of reusable sheets that grow one Human Endeavour idea: evidence changes nothing until it is communicated, and the way it is shared, as advice each person can act on or as a rule for everyone, shapes what people think and the policies a community sets. Print the scaffolds once and slot them into the science lessons you already teach.

AC9S7H04
explore the role of science communication in informing individual viewpoints and community policies and regulations

What a skill companion is

Human Endeavour ideas are not a topic of their own. They grow inside the science units a class teaches all year, such as Classifying Living Things, Energy Flow in Ecosystems, Earth, Sun and Moon, Balanced and Unbalanced Forces, The Particle Model of Matter, and Pure Substances and Mixtures. So this pack is not a full term of lessons. It is three reusable scaffolds, a map of where they fit, and a short stand-alone lesson for teaching the idea on its own first.

Start here: five minutes

  1. Read the pairing map on the next page: it shows a piece of communicated science in each Year 7 topic.
  2. Print the evidence-to-decision sheet whenever a topic meets advice or a rule, and the case-study sheet once per student.
  3. Cut out the cards once. They are reused all year, whenever a class meets science in the news or in a rule.
  4. Open the free interactive unit on your board when you want a worked example of the idea.
  5. Run the one-page mini-lesson first if you want to teach the idea before folding it into a topic.

No science background needed

Each scaffold explains itself in plain words, and the answer sheet gives a model chain for the unit’s sun-safety evidence, the case-study answers, the card key with a reason for each, a model answer for every Year 7 topic and a quick three-level guide. In Year 6, students saw how communities use science to make decisions. The step up in Year 7 is the communication itself: how the form of a message, a slogan, a number or a rule, decides whom it reaches and what it can change, for each person and for the whole community, and how a message can mislead.

On the board
This pack is the printable half of a free interactive unit. On screen, students choose “A simple slogan”, “A daily UV index” and “A school sun-protection rule” in “Communicating sun safety: each way gains and gives up something”, switch between “Table”, “Bar chart” and “Line graph” in “Share of people who regularly protect their skin in summer”, and sort statements with “Supports” and “Does not support” in “Does a daily air-quality index help people?”. Each scaffold in this pack turns one of those moves into something students do on paper.
seegongsik.com/au/y7/human-endeavour/AC9S7H04
Aligned to the Australian Curriculum V9 (AC9S7H04). This pack is original material from seegongsik, independently produced and not endorsed by ACARA. Curriculum content descriptors are (c) ACARA, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Free to print and use in class.
Where the idea fitsPairing map

Slot the idea into your science lessons

Every science topic has evidence that reaches people as advice or as a rule. This map shows one example in each Year 7 topic, how it is communicated, and which scaffold to reach for. You do not run these as extra lessons; you fold them into the science you teach.

When you teachCommunicated scienceFrom evidence to decisionScaffold
Classifying Living Things (AC9S7U01)Listing threatened speciesScientists assess each species and publish which are at risk of dying out; a listing brings protection under the lawFrom evidence to decision
Energy Flow in Ecosystems (AC9S7U02)Fishing size and bag limitsScience on how fish populations grow and feed becomes limits on how many fish, and how small, can be kept, explained on signs and appsThe cards
Earth, Sun and Moon (AC9S7U03)Daily sun protection timesThe Bureau of Meteorology publishes the times each day when the UV index is 3 or above, highest when the Sun is high; schools use them to set hat rulesFrom evidence to decision
Balanced and Unbalanced Forces (AC9S7U04)SeatbeltsCrash tests showed that a body keeps moving when the car stops suddenly; Victoria made wearing seatbelts compulsory in 1970, the first law of its kind in the worldFrom evidence to decision
The Particle Model of Matter (AC9S7U05)Smoke and the air-quality ratingMonitoring stations measure the tiny particles in smoke and publish a rating; health advice and school decisions followThe cards
Pure Substances and Mixtures (AC9S7U06)Boil-water noticesWhen tests find germs in town water, the water supplier tells people to boil their drinking water until tests are clear againFrom evidence to decision
Any science topicA science story in the newsAsk who it informs, what rule it might lead to, and whether it misleadsThe cards first

The three moves, and the picture that backs each one

When you want a worked example on the board, open the interactive unit and use the picture that matches the move.

How the scaffolds build the idea

The evidence-to-decision sheet turns one piece of evidence into a message for each person and a rule for the community, and asks how to check each one worked. The case study follows the national fire danger ratings, redesigned in 2022 after a survey showed most people did not understand the old ones. The cards sort communications by what they do: inform a person, set a shared rule, or mislead.

Scaffold 1 · From evidence to decisionOne per student

Turn evidence into action

NameClassDate

Pick one piece of evidence from our topic. Plan two ways to share it: advice that each person can act on, and a rule for the whole community. Then compare them.

The evidence:
Where it comes from:
Who needs to know:
For each person: adviceFor the community: a rule
Form
slogan, number, graph, story, sign, rule ...
The message
write it as people would see it
What it could change
a choice, a habit, a policy
How we would check
what to count before and after
1. Which of your two messages would reach more people? Which would change more of what people do?
2. Why might a community need the rule as well as the advice?
3. How could either message mislead if it were written carelessly?

Teacher note: the unit’s sun-safety evidence fills the sheet well as a first go; a model is on the answer sheet.

Scaffold 2 · Case studyOne per student

Fire danger ratings: a message redesigned

NameClassDate

Every day in the fire season, fire agencies rate the fire danger for each district from the weather and from how much dry plant material could burn. For decades the ratings rested on science from the 1960s and were shown on six levels. One of Australia’s largest community surveys then found that most people did not understand the levels, or what to do at each one.

On 1 September 2022 a new national system began. It has four levels, each with a short action, and days that need no action show “No rating”. Behind the levels, the new system models eight kinds of vegetation instead of only forest and grass, so each rating fits its district more closely. On the most dangerous days, communities act together: in some states, schools in high-risk areas close.

Before
Low-Moderate
High
Very High
Severe
Extreme
Catastrophic
From 1 September 2022
ModeratePlan and prepare.
HighBe ready to act.
ExtremeTake action now to protect your life and property.
CatastrophicFor your survival, leave bushfire risk areas.
1. The fire danger was rated every day. Why was that not enough to keep people safe?
2. What evidence did the designers use to change the system?
3. Each new level comes with an action. How does that help a person decide what to do?
4. Name one decision a person might make, and one decision a community might make, on a Catastrophic day.
5. What does the new system gain by having fewer levels? What might it lose?
6. How could you check that the new ratings work better than the old ones?
Scaffold 3 · Message cards (cut out)Reuse all year

What does the message do?

Cut out the cards and lay down the three grey heading cards. Sort each communication by what it does: informs a person, sets a rule for everyone, or misleads. Be ready to say why.

Informs a personGives people evidence so each can decide what to do.Heading
Sets a shared ruleTurns evidence into a policy or law for everyone.Heading
MisleadsTwists, overstates or hides the evidence.Heading
An advert says a drink is “scientifically proven” to boost brain power, but names no study.Card A
A weather app shows that today’s UV index is 11, extreme, and that sun protection is needed from 9 am to 4 pm.Card B
The state declares a total fire ban, so no one may light a fire in the open that day.Card C
A food label shows how much sugar is in each serve.Card D
A graph of rainfall starts its scale at 95 mm instead of 0, so a tiny change looks huge.Card E
A school makes hats compulsory outdoors from September to April.Card F
After evidence that tanning beds raise the risk of skin cancer, the states ban commercial solariums.Card G
A water app shows a family how much water they used this week, compared with similar homes.Card H
A headline says chocolate makes you smarter, but the study tested 20 mice.Card I
A post shares a photo of one cold day as proof that the climate is not warming.Card J
A city limits garden watering to two days a week while the dams are low.Card K
A scientist answers questions on the radio about a new study of sleep and screens.Card L
From the news or our school:
Write your own
From the news or our school:
Write your own
From the news or our school:
Write your own

Teacher note: four cards go in each pile. The answer sheet lists which is which, and why.

Mini-lesson · Teacher planAbout 30 minutes

One fact, two messages

Use this stand-alone lesson to teach the idea on its own, before you fold it into a science topic. Groups turn one piece of sun-safety evidence into advice for each student and a rule for the whole school, then swap and test each other’s messages.

We are learning to

Success criteria

You need

Lesson flow (about 30 minutes)

5 minOne fact
Read the evidence together, then show the board (see the box).

Ask: “Who needs to know this? What would you want each of them to do?”

10 minTwo messages
In each group, one pair writes advice for students (a slogan, a poster line or a daily display), and the other pair drafts a school rule with a one-line reason.

Ask: “What did you keep from the evidence? What did you leave out, and is the message still true?”

10 minTest it
Groups swap and score each message on three questions: is it true to the evidence, is it clear in five seconds, and would it change what people do?

Ask: “Which message would reach more people? Which would change more of what they do?”

5 minSort
Tables sort the message cards under the three heading cards.

Ask: “Which cards mislead, and how would you fix one of them?”

Running it shorter? Write the advice only, and draft the rule in your next science lesson.

On the board
For a worked example, open the unit and choose each option in “Communicating sun safety: each way gains and gives up something”. Then switch “Share of people who regularly protect their skin in summer” between “Table” and “Line graph” to see how communicators check that a message worked.
seegongsik.com/au/y7/human-endeavour/AC9S7H04

Watch for these ideas

Make it easier, make it bigger

Answers and look-fors

The next sheet has a model chain for the sun-safety evidence, the case-study answers, the card key, a model answer for each Year 7 topic, and a quick three-level guide.

Answers · For the teacherModel responses

Answers and look-fors

From evidence to decision: sun safety

Evidence: UV radiation from the Sun can damage skin, and protection is recommended when the UV index is 3 or above. Where it comes from: public health research, and the Bureau of Meteorology’s daily UV forecasts. Who needs to know: students, families and teachers.

For each person: adviceFor the community: a rule
Forma slogan, and the daily UV indexa school sun-protection rule
The messageUV 3 or above today? Hat, shirt, sunscreen, shade.Hats on outside whenever the UV index is 3 or above.
What it could changeeach student’s choice to cover upevery student is protected, including those who missed the advice
How we would checksurvey how often students cover up, before and aftercount hats in the playground on days of UV 3 or above, before and after

1. The slogan and the daily number reach more people; the rule changes more of what students do at school. 2. Advice relies on each person choosing to follow it, while a rule protects everyone, including those who never saw the advice. 3. By dropping the condition (UV of 3 or above), by making UV sound like a summer-only problem, or by giving no source.

Case study: fire danger ratings

1. A rating protects people only if they understand it and know what to do, and most people did not understand the old levels. 2. One of Australia’s largest community surveys, which showed that most people did not understand them. 3. It turns the rating into an instruction, so no one has to work out what a level means in the moment. 4. A person: leave a bushfire risk area early, before any fire starts. A community: close schools in high-risk areas, or declare a total fire ban. 5. Gains: two fewer levels, each clear enough to remember and act on. Loses: some of the fine detail between levels. 6. Survey people’s understanding of the levels before and after the change, or count how many people acted on the advice on days of high danger.

Message cards

CardPileWhy
AMisleadsA big claim with no evidence anyone can check.
BInforms a personA local number each person can act on.
CSets a shared ruleA rule that applies to everyone.
DInforms a personInformation each shopper can use to choose.
EMisleadsThe scale makes a small change look large.
FSets a shared ruleA policy that protects every student.
GSets a shared ruleEvidence turned into a law.
HInforms a personFeedback each household can act on.
IMisleadsIt overstates a small study that was not on people.
JMisleadsOne day picked out of decades of records.
KSets a shared ruleA restriction everyone must follow.
LInforms a personExplains the evidence so listeners can decide for themselves.

For each misleading card, ask students to rewrite it so it is true: name the study, start the scale at 0, or show the long record.

What a good answer sounds like

Topic and messageHow it informs people and the community, at standard
Classifying Living Things (AC9S7U01)
Listing threatened species
A clear, public assessment shapes what people think of a species, and the listing triggers laws that protect it and its habitat; without the published evidence there would be no rule.
Energy Flow in Ecosystems (AC9S7U02)
Fishing size and bag limits
Explaining that small fish go back so they can breed first wins support from people who fish, and the limits themselves are the community rule.
Earth, Sun and Moon (AC9S7U03)
Daily sun protection times
A daily, local time informs each person when to cover up, and the same times let a school set a rule that protects every student.
Balanced and Unbalanced Forces (AC9S7U04)
Seatbelts
Explaining the crash-test evidence changed what people thought of seatbelts, and the law then made wearing one the rule for everyone.
The Particle Model of Matter (AC9S7U05)
Smoke and the air-quality rating
One published rating informs each person’s choices, such as staying indoors, and gives schools a shared trigger, such as moving sport inside.
Pure Substances and Mixtures (AC9S7U06)
Boil-water notices
A clear, fast notice lets each household act at once, and national guidelines set the limits every water supplier tests against.

A quick three-level guide

MoveWorking towardsAt standardBeyond
Fit the message to its jobwrites one message for everyonewrites advice for each person and a rule for the community, each suited to its audienceexplains when a rule is needed rather than advice
Keep it truestretches or leaves out the evidencekeeps the message true to the evidence, with its sourcespots misleading graphs and headlines, and fixes them
Check the effectassumes the message workednames what to count before and afterplans a fair check, and says what result would change the message

A student at standard turns evidence into advice and a rule that each stay true to it, and says how to check that they worked. The idea grows all year, so keep the cards coming back whenever science reaches the news.