Asking Questions and Predicting: a skill companion
A small set of reusable sheets that grow one inquiry skill: spotting a pattern, turning it into a question about the relationship behind it, and making a prediction with a reason from what has been observed. Print the scaffolds once and slot them into the science lessons you are already teaching.
What a skill companion is
Inquiry skills are not a topic of their own. They grow inside the science units a class teaches all year, such as Living and Non-living Things, Soils, Rocks and Minerals, Heat and Temperature, and Solids, Liquids and Changing State. So this pack is not a full term of lessons. It is three reusable scaffolds, a map of where they fit, and a short stand-alone lesson for teaching the skill on its own first.
Start here: five minutes
- Read the pairing map on the next page: it shows which scaffold fits which science lesson.
- Print the question planner and the prediction frame, one each per child, whenever a lesson starts from a pattern children have noticed.
- Cut out the evidence cards once. They are reused all year, and the blank cards fit any topic.
- Open the free interactive unit on your board when you want a worked example of the skill.
- Run the one-page mini-lesson first if you want to teach the skill before folding it into a topic.
No science background needed
This pack is written for the busy generalist teacher. Each scaffold explains itself in plain words, and the answer sheet gives the evidence-card key, a model question and prediction for every Year 3 topic, and a quick three-level guide, so you can walk in and use it.
Slot the skill into your science lessons
The same skill of asking a question and predicting fits into every science unit. This map shows a pattern children can observe in each Year 3 topic, a question to pose about it, and which scaffold to reach for. You do not run these as extra lessons; you fold them into the science you teach.
| When you teach | Pattern children can see | Question to pose | Scaffold to slot in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Living and Non-living Things (AC9S3U01) | Bean seeds on damp cotton wool sprout; seeds left dry do not | Do bean seeds need water to sprout? | Planner, then the prediction frame |
| Soils, Rocks and Minerals (AC9S3U02) | After rain, puddles stay longer on clay ground than in the sandpit | Does water drain faster through sandy soil than through clay soil? | Planner, then the prediction frame |
| Heat and Temperature (AC9S3U03) | In a cup of hot tap water, a metal spoon warms up before a wooden one | Does a metal spoon warm up faster than a wooden spoon? | Prediction frame, then the spoon evidence cards |
| Solids, Liquids and Changing State (AC9S3U04) | Ice melts faster in a warm room than in a cool one | Does ice melt faster when the room is warmer? | Planner, then the prediction frame |
| Any science topic | A pattern a child spots for themselves | The child turns what they observed into their own question and prediction | Planner first, then a blank evidence card |
The three moves, and the picture that backs each one
When you want a worked example on the board, open the interactive unit and use the picture that matches the move children are working on.
- Turn a pattern into a fair question, with one thing to change and one thing to measure: “Frame the question: change only one thing” and “Decide what to measure before you start”.
- Spot the reading that breaks a pattern and is worth checking again: “Spot the reading to check again”.
- Weigh which findings really test a prediction: “Weigh the evidence for the prediction”.
How the scaffolds build the skill
The question planner turns something a child noticed into a question about the relationship behind it, with one thing to change and one thing to measure. The prediction frame adds a prediction with a reason from what was observed, and comes back after the test to check it. The evidence cards sharpen the last step: telling a finding that tests the prediction from one that is true but beside the point. Used together across the year, they make asking questions and predicting a habit.
From a pattern to a question
Science often starts with something you notice happening again and again. A pattern like that can become a question you can explore with a fair test.
What I noticed
The pattern in one sentence
When ______________________ changes, ______________________ changes too.
My question
A question you can explore asks about the relationship. These openers can help.
- Does ______ make ______ happen faster?
- What happens to ______ when ______ changes?
- Does more ______ mean more ______ ?
To explore it fairly
Teacher note: if a child ticks “Not yet”, the question usually has nothing to change or nothing to measure. Help them name one of each, then reword it.
My prediction
A prediction says what you expect to happen and gives a reason from something you have already observed. That reason is what makes it more than a wild guess.
Before we test
I predict that ...After we test
What happened:A prediction the evidence does not support is still good science: you found something out, and it gives you a new question to ask.
Does this finding support the prediction?
Cut out the cards. Lay down one prediction card, then sort its finding cards into two piles: findings that support the prediction, and findings that do not. Some findings are true but beside the point: they do not test the prediction at all.
Teacher note: the two piles are “supports” and “does not support”. The answer sheet lists which is which, and why. The blank cards let children add a finding of their own, then swap it with another table to sort.
From a pattern to a prediction
Use this stand-alone lesson to teach the skill on its own, before you fold it into a science topic. It runs the three scaffolds in this pack in one short block, so children meet the whole skill in one go and then reuse the sheets all year.
We are learning to
- notice a pattern in what we observe,
- turn it into a question we can explore with a fair test,
- make a prediction with a reason, and weigh the evidence for it.
Success criteria
- I can ask a question about a pattern that a fair test can explore.
- I can make a prediction and say what I observed that makes me think it.
You need
- the evidence cards (scaffold 3), one set per table, cut out ahead or by fast finishers,
- the question planner and the prediction frame (scaffolds 1 and 2), one each per child,
- two ice cubes of the same size on two plates of the same kind, one set in a sunny spot and one in the shade as the lesson starts,
- the free interactive unit on your board, if you have one (optional).
Lesson flow (about 30 minutes)
| 5 min | Spot the pattern Put out the two ice cubes. Ask children when they have seen ice melt fast and when slowly: ice blocks on a hot day, ice in a drink, frost on a cold morning. Ask: “Where have you seen ice melt quickly? What was the same each time?” |
| 10 min | Frame the question Each child fills the question planner: the pattern, a question about it, the one thing to change, what to measure and what to keep the same. Show the board (see the box). Ask: “If one cube is bigger than the other, can we still tell what made it melt faster?” |
| 10 min | Predict Children fill the top of the prediction frame: what they predict will happen to the two cubes, and what they have observed that makes them think so. Ask: “What have you seen before that makes you think that?” |
| 5 min | Weigh the evidence Look at the two cubes together and fill the bottom of the frame. Then tables sort the spoon cards into the two piles. Ask: “This finding is true. Does it test the prediction?” |
Running it shorter? Stop after Frame the question, and pick up the prediction frame and the evidence cards inside your next science lesson, where children test a real prediction.
Watch for these ideas
- A question no test can answer, like “is ice better than water?”. Ask what they could change and what they could measure.
- Changing two things at once, such as a bigger cube in the warmer spot. Then nobody can tell which change made the difference.
- A prediction with no reason. Ask what they have observed before that points that way.
Make it easier, make it bigger
- Easier: fill the planner together as a class, and sort only the spoon cards.
- Bigger: write a finding on a blank card that would not support the prediction, and swap it with another table to sort.
Answers and look-fors
The next sheet has the evidence-card key, a model question and prediction for each Year 3 topic, and a quick three-level guide.
Answers and look-fors
Evidence cards: does the finding support the prediction?
Spoons (Heat and Temperature): A metal spoon warms up faster than a wooden spoon in the same cup of hot water.
| Finding card | Supports? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| After 2 minutes, the handle of the metal spoon felt warm and the wooden one did not. | Yes | It is a result of the test, and it matches what the prediction said would happen. |
| The metal spoon was shiny and the wooden spoon was brown. | No | The colour of a spoon does not tell you how fast it warmed up, so it does not test the prediction. |
| A thermometer taped to the metal spoon rose faster than one taped to the wooden spoon. | Yes | A measured result that matches the prediction is strong evidence for it. |
| We did the test on a Tuesday morning. | No | The day of the week has nothing to do with how spoons warm up. |
| In all three trials, the metal spoon felt warm first. | Yes | The same result again and again makes the evidence stronger. |
Seeds (Living and Non-living Things): Bean seeds kept damp will sprout sooner than bean seeds kept dry.
| Finding card | Supports? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The seeds came from a packet bought at the garden shop. | No | Where the seeds came from does not test whether water helps them sprout. |
| After 4 days, the damp seeds had small shoots and the dry seeds had none. | Yes | It is a result of the test, and it matches the prediction. |
| One damp seed did not sprout at all. | No | On its own it does not support the prediction, but one seed in ten is an odd result to check, not proof the prediction is wrong. |
| By day 7, 9 of the 10 damp seeds had sprouted and none of the 10 dry seeds had. | Yes | Counting every seed shows the pattern clearly, so this supports the prediction. |
| The dry seeds were kept in a blue cup. | No | The colour of the cup does not test the prediction about water. |
Blank cards are marked the same way: does the finding come from the test, and does it match what the prediction said would happen?
Planner and prediction frame: what a good response sounds like
Responses will vary, and that is fine. The point is a question a fair test can explore and a prediction with a reason from something observed. Here is what an at-standard response sounds like in each Year 3 topic.
| Topic | A question at standard | A prediction at standard |
|---|---|---|
| Living and Non-living Things | Do bean seeds need water to sprout? | I predict the damp seeds will sprout and the dry ones will not, because I have observed garden plants wilt when the soil dries out. |
| Soils, Rocks and Minerals | Does water drain faster through sandy soil than through clay soil? | I predict the water will drain through the sandy soil faster, because I have observed puddles stay longer on clay ground than in the sandpit. |
| Heat and Temperature | Does a metal spoon warm up faster than a wooden spoon? | I predict the metal spoon will warm up first, because I have observed that a metal pot handle gets hot and a wooden one stays cool. |
| Solids, Liquids and Changing State | Does ice melt faster when the room is warmer? | I predict the cube in the warmer room will melt first, because I have observed ice blocks melt quickly on hot days. |
A quick three-level guide
| Move | Working towards | At standard | Beyond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pose a question about a pattern | asks a question with help, sometimes one no test can answer | asks a question about a pattern that a fair test can explore | names the one thing to change and the thing to measure |
| Predict from observations | makes a guess with no reason | says what will happen and gives a reason from something observed | links the prediction to a pattern seen more than once |
| Weigh the evidence | counts any true fact as evidence | sorts findings that test the prediction from ones beside the point | treats an odd result as a reason to check again, not as proof |
A child at standard asks a question a fair test can explore and gives a prediction with a reason from something observed. The skill grows all year, so keep the scaffolds coming back in every science topic.