Society Shapes Research: a skill companion
A small set of reusable sheets that grow one way of thinking about science at Year 10 depth: how what a society values and needs (safety, food, health of the land, curiosity, profit) decides which questions get researched first, who gets to ask them, and how the focus can shift when a new need appears. Print the scaffolds once and slot them into the science lessons you already teach.
What a skill companion is
Ideas about how science works are not a topic of their own. They grow inside the units a class teaches all year. So this pack is not a full term of lessons. It is three reusable scaffolds, a map of where they fit, and a short stand-alone lesson for teaching the idea first.
Start here: five minutes
- Read the pairing map on the next page: it gives a need of society and the research it pushed for each Year 10 topic.
- Print the stakeholder map when a topic touches a local issue, and the case study when a class studies the atmosphere.
- Cut out the cards once. They are reused all year.
- Open the free interactive unit on your board when you want a worked example.
- Run the one-page mini-lesson first if you want to teach the idea before folding it into a topic.
The step up from Year 9
The descriptor is the same in Years 9 and 10; the depth is not. In Year 9 students mapped a research agenda and followed one drought. In Year 10 they map several groups with different values around one issue, including the Traditional Owners of the land, and follow a case in which a scientific warning reshaped research and law across the world, then shifted again when the fix caused a new problem.
A need of society behind every Year 10 topic
Research money and attention are limited, so society’s needs and values decide much of where they go. This map gives, for each Year 10 topic, a need or value and the research it pushed forward.
| When you teach | A need or value of society | The research it pushed |
|---|---|---|
| Heredity: Cell Division and Inheritance (AC9S10U01) | Enough food in drier years | Plant genetics: finding and breeding in genes for drought tolerance |
| Evolution by Natural Selection (AC9S10U02) | Saving the Tasmanian devil from a contagious cancer | Tracking devils that survive it, to see whether resistance is evolving |
| The Big Bang and the Universe (AC9S10U03) | Curiosity, and taking part in big international projects | Large radio telescopes in Australia, including a share of the Square Kilometre Array |
| Energy Flow and Climate Change (AC9S10U04) | Safety from bushfires, droughts and heatwaves | Better climate and fire-weather forecasts |
| Newton’s Laws of Motion (AC9S10U05) | Fewer deaths on the roads | Crash testing, seatbelts, airbags and crumple zones |
| Atomic Structure and the Periodic Table (AC9S10U06) | Cleaner energy and better electronics | Battery materials such as lithium, which Australia mines |
| Reaction Types and Rates (AC9S10U07) | Cleaner city air | Catalysts that clean car exhaust and make industry use less energy |
The three moves, and the picture that backs each one
When you want a worked example on the board, open the interactive unit and use the picture that matches the move.
- Weigh competing needs for limited money: “One grant, several pressing needs”.
- Find what really drives a research focus: “What really drives the focus of research?”.
- Watch a new need shift the focus: “How an emerging need shifts the research focus”.
Who wants which question answered first?
The issue: Summers in our city are getting hotter, and heatwaves are lasting longer. Each group below would like research done, but each values different things and would ask a different question first. Fill in the map. The first row is done for you.
| Group | What it values | The question it would put first | How it can influence research |
|---|---|---|---|
| People living in older houses with no air conditioning | Safety and comfort at home, and affordable power bills | Which cheap changes to a house keep it coolest on a hot night? | Votes, community groups, telling their story to the media |
| The city council | |||
| A sports club with outdoor grounds | |||
| The electricity company | |||
| The Traditional Owners of the land |
A hole in the sky: how a need reshaped research
High in the atmosphere, the ozone layer absorbs much of the Sun’s harmful ultraviolet light. Australia, with one of the highest rates of skin cancer in the world, had good reason to care when scientists warned it was being damaged.
| 1974 | Chemists Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland warn that CFC gases, used in spray cans and fridges, could break down the ozone layer, which absorbs harmful ultraviolet light. |
| 1976 | The Cape Grim station in north-west Tasmania begins measuring the clean air from the Southern Ocean, including the CFCs in it. |
| 1985 | British Antarctic Survey scientists publish measurements showing a deep seasonal loss of ozone over Antarctica: the ozone hole. |
| 1987 | Countries agree the Montreal Protocol to phase out CFCs. Research turns to safer replacement gases and to watching the ozone layer. |
| 2016 | Some of the replacement gases turn out to be strong greenhouse gases; countries agree to cut those too. |
| Today | Measurements show the ozone layer slowly recovering; over Antarctica it is expected to return to its 1980 state around the 2060s. |
Questions
Which research did each need push?
Cut out the twelve cards. Six describe a need of society; six describe a direction of research. Pair each need with the research it pushed. Then rank the six needs by how urgent your community would say they are, and compare your ranking with another group’s.
Teacher note: the answer sheet lists the pairs. Rankings will differ: the point is that values decide them.
Who sets the question?
Summers in our city are getting hotter, and heatwaves are lasting longer. Groups each speak for one part of the community: residents in older houses, the council, a sports club, the electricity company, and the Traditional Owners of the land. Each proposes the one research question it wants answered first. The class has only enough research money for two questions. The choice shows that what gets researched depends on what people value and who is heard, as well as on the science.
We are learning to
- explain how the needs and values of groups shape research questions,
- compare the questions different groups would ask about the same issue,
- reflect on whose voices decide where research goes.
Success criteria
- I can explain why my group chose its question, by the value behind it.
- I can say which values decided the class’s choice, and whose need was left out.
You need
- role cards (the five groups, written on paper), six tokens for each student to spend on the questions, and the board for the questions,
- the stakeholder map and case study (scaffolds 1 and 2), and the cards from scaffold 3, one set per table.
Lesson flow (about 30 minutes)
| 8 min | Our question Each group writes the one research question it wants answered first, and the value behind it, on the board. Ask: “Is your question the most important one, or the most important one to you?” |
| 10 min | Make the case Each group has one minute to argue for its question. Students then spend their tokens. Show the board (see the box). Ask: “Did the best-argued question win, or the one most people felt?” |
| 7 min | Look back The class reads the two winning questions and asks whose need was left out. While they talk, tables match the cards. Ask: “Which group would most struggle to be heard in a real city? What would help?” |
| 5 min | When needs change Announce a new problem: a week-long blackout in a heatwave. Groups say how their question would change, and why. |
Running it shorter? Skip the speeches; groups write their question and the class votes with tokens.
Watch for these ideas
- Thinking research questions come from science alone, with no people deciding.
- Treating the group with the most money or votes as the one with the most need.
- Leaving out groups whose knowledge of the land could shape the research itself.
Make it easier, make it bigger
- Easier: give each group a ready-made question and ask only for the value behind it.
- Bigger: write one question that serves two groups at once, and argue for it.
Answers and look-fors
The next sheet has the stakeholder map completed, the case study answered, the card pairs, and a quick three-level guide.
Answers and look-fors
Stakeholder map (rows 2 to 5)
| Group | Values | Question first | Influence |
|---|---|---|---|
| The city council | Safe streets and parks, and spending ratepayers’ money well | Which streets get hottest, and how much do street trees cool them? | Its own budget, planning rules, grants to universities |
| A sports club with outdoor grounds | Players’ safety and keeping the season going | At what temperature should games be moved or shortened? | Its members, sporting associations |
| The electricity company | Reliable supply on the hottest days, and its profits | How high will demand climb on the hottest afternoons, and how can it be eased? | Funding its own research, partnerships with universities |
| The Traditional Owners of the land | Caring for Country, and keeping knowledge of the land alive | How can traditional knowledge of plants, water and shade guide how the city is greened? | Partnerships, consent over the use of their knowledge, land management roles |
Any first choice is fine if it names the value behind it. Residents in hot houses have a pressing need but little money or organisation; groups, councils and journalists can help them be heard.
Case study
The needs and values: protecting health from ultraviolet light, especially in a country with high skin-cancer rates, and caring for the environment. After 1985, research turned to measuring ozone loss and finding its cause; after 1987, to safer replacement gases and long-term monitoring. Cape Grim mattered because a long, careful record of clean air shows changes that a single measurement cannot, including whether the phase-out is working. In 2016 the focus shifted again because the replacement gases were found to warm the climate: a fix raised a new problem. Companies making or using CFCs, and countries that relied on them, had reasons to argue against a fast phase-out, mainly cost.
Need and research cards (pairs)
| Cards | Need | Research |
|---|---|---|
| G and A | Long droughts threaten farms. | Breeding wheat that grows well with less water. |
| D and J | Heatwaves put people at risk in hot houses. | Measuring which streets and buildings stay hottest, and how trees cool them. |
| E and L | A new disease spreads through a crop. | Finding the genes that let some plants resist it. |
| B and H | Electricity bills keep rising. | Making solar cells and batteries more efficient and cheaper. |
| K and F | Fish catches are falling. | Counting fish populations and how fast they breed, to set catch limits. |
| I and C | Coastal towns face rising seas. | Mapping erosion and modelling storm surges. |
A quick three-level guide
| Move | Working towards | At standard | Beyond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Needs and values | sees research as chosen by scientists alone | links a research focus to a need or value of society | explains how different values lead to different questions about one issue |
| Voices | notices only the loudest group | compares what several groups would ask | identifies a group with little influence and how it could be heard |
| Change | treats a research focus as fixed | explains how a new need shifted a focus | explains how a fix can raise a new problem that shifts research again |
In the mini-lesson, the token vote usually follows the questions most students feel personally, not always the most urgent. The blackout makes most groups shift to keeping people cool without power, a new need that reshapes every question.