Science, Technology and Engineering: a skill companion
A small set of reusable sheets that grow one way of thinking about science at Year 10 depth: how a new technology lets science see what it could not see before, how new science leads to technologies and engineering, and how the two drive each other round and round. Print the scaffolds once and slot them into the science lessons you already teach.
What a skill companion is
Ideas about how science works are not a topic of their own. They grow inside the units a class teaches all year. So this pack is not a full term of lessons. It is three reusable scaffolds, a map of where they fit, and a short stand-alone lesson for teaching the idea first.
Start here: five minutes
- Read the pairing map on the next page: it gives both directions of the cycle for each Year 10 topic.
- Print the cycle mapper at the end of any topic, and the case study when a class studies the big bang.
- Cut out the cards once. They are reused all year.
- Open the free interactive unit on your board when you want a worked example.
- Run the one-page mini-lesson first if you want to teach the idea before folding it into a topic.
The step up from Year 9
The descriptor is the same in Years 9 and 10; the depth is not. In Year 9 students followed one discovery from X-rays to medical scanners. In Year 10 they map both directions of the cycle in every topic, follow a case in which a communications antenna made a cosmological discovery that then set the design of three satellites, and build an instrument of their own.
Both directions of the cycle in every Year 10 topic
Technology and science push each other forward. This map gives, for each Year 10 topic, a technology that moved the science on and a piece of science that led to a technology or a piece of engineering.
| When you teach | Technology that moved the science on | Science that led to a technology |
|---|---|---|
| Heredity: Cell Division and Inheritance (AC9S10U01) | DNA sequencing reads genes letter by letter | Genetic tests; crops bred for chosen traits |
| Evolution by Natural Selection (AC9S10U02) | Comparing DNA builds family trees of species | Using antibiotics so that resistance spreads more slowly |
| The Big Bang and the Universe (AC9S10U03) | Telescopes, spectroscopes and radio antennas | Satellite navigation, whose clocks are corrected for relativity |
| Energy Flow and Climate Change (AC9S10U04) | Satellites, ice-core drills, automatic weather stations | Infrared sensors that measure carbon dioxide indoors |
| Newton’s Laws of Motion (AC9S10U05) | Light gates, data loggers, slow-motion cameras | Seatbelts, airbags, crumple zones, rockets |
| Atomic Structure and the Periodic Table (AC9S10U06) | Spectroscopes and particle accelerators | Lasers and LED lights, built on electron energy levels |
| Reaction Types and Rates (AC9S10U07) | Gas sensors and data loggers | Catalytic converters in car exhausts |
The three moves, and the picture that backs each one
When you want a worked example on the board, open the interactive unit and use the picture that matches the move.
- Follow better instruments to deeper science: “Better instruments, deeper science”.
- Find science that became technology: “Examples of science contributing to technology”.
- Weigh the trade-offs in engineering an instrument: “Designing an instrument to study the universe”.
Technology to science, science to technology
For each topic, name a technology that let the science move forward, and a piece of science that led to a technology or a piece of engineering. The first row is done for you.
| Topic | Technology → science | Science → technology |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction Types and Rates | Gas sensors and data loggers record a reaction many times a second, so rates can be measured precisely. | Knowing how catalysts and surface area speed reactions led to catalytic converters that clean car exhaust. |
| Heredity: Cell Division and Inheritance | ||
| The Big Bang and the Universe | ||
| Energy Flow and Climate Change | ||
| Newton’s Laws of Motion |
From a hiss in an antenna to a map of the early universe
A faint glow left from the hot early universe fills all of space, but it is far too cold to see: it arrives as microwaves. It was found by engineers testing a communications antenna, and then measured by satellites built for nothing else.
| 1948 | Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman predict that a hot early universe should have left a faint glow, now very cold, filling all of space. |
| 1964 | At Bell Telephone Laboratories, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson test a large horn antenna built for satellite communication and find a faint hiss of microwaves from every direction. |
| 1965 | They clean out the antenna (pigeons had nested in it) but the hiss stays. A team of physicists nearby explains it as the predicted glow; both groups publish. |
| 1989 | The COBE satellite is launched with instruments designed for this one job. It finds the glow matches the spectrum predicted for a hot beginning, at about 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. |
| 2001 | The WMAP satellite maps tiny differences in the glow across the sky. |
| 2009 | The Planck satellite maps it more finely still; its data give the age of the universe as about 13.8 billion years. |
Questions
Which advance did each technology make possible?
Cut out the twelve cards. Six name a technology; six describe an advance in science. Pair each technology with the advance it made possible. Then, for any two pairs, say how the new science later fed back into technology.
Teacher note: the answer sheet lists the pairs and a way each fed back into technology.
Build an instrument, see something new
A diffraction grating spreads light into its colours. Fixed to a cardboard tube with a narrow slit at the other end, it makes a spectroscope. Through it, an old-style hot-filament globe shows a smooth rainbow, while a fluorescent tube shows bright separate lines. The same kind of instrument, made far more precise, showed what the Sun and distant stars are made of, and the science of those lines in turn led to fluorescent lamps, LEDs and lasers.
We are learning to
- explain how a new instrument lets science observe what it could not before,
- explain how new science leads to new technology,
- describe the cycle in which each drives the other.
Success criteria
- I can describe the difference between a smooth spectrum and a line spectrum, and what lines tell a scientist.
- I can trace one complete loop from an instrument to new science and back to a technology.
You need
- for each pair: a cardboard tube, a small square of diffraction grating, black card, tape and scissors; in the room, a fluorescent light, a filament or halogen globe if you have one, and an LED torch,
- the cycle mapper and case study (scaffolds 1 and 2), and the cards from scaffold 3, one set per table. Never look at the Sun, through the tube or without it.
Lesson flow (about 30 minutes)
| 10 min | Build Pairs tape the grating over one end of the tube and black card with a 1 mm slit over the other. Ask: “What would make this instrument better: a narrower slit, a finer grating, a scale to read positions?” |
| 10 min | Look Pairs aim the slit at each light and sketch what they see. Show the board (see the box). Ask: “One light gives a smooth rainbow, another gives separate lines. What could the lines be telling us?” |
| 7 min | Close the loop Explain that every element gives its own pattern of lines. Pairs write one loop: instrument, then discovery, then technology. While they write, tables match the cards. Ask: “Helium was found in the Sun’s light before it was found on Earth. How could that be?” |
| 3 min | Engineer it Pairs name one change an engineer would make so the instrument could measure, not just show, the lines. |
Running it shorter? Build the spectroscopes ahead of time, and spend the lesson looking and closing the loop.
Watch for these ideas
- Seeing technology as only applied science: often the instrument came first and the science followed.
- Treating engineers and scientists as working apart rather than depending on each other.
- Thinking the colours are made by the grating rather than separated from the light.
Make it easier, make it bigger
- Easier: build one spectroscope for each table ahead of time and focus on the loop.
- Bigger: tape a paper scale inside the tube and compare the line positions from two different fluorescent lights.
Answers and look-fors
The next sheet has model rows for the cycle mapper, the case study answered, the card pairs, and a quick three-level guide.
Answers and look-fors
Cycle mapper (rows 2 to 5)
| Topic | Technology to science | Science to technology |
|---|---|---|
| Heredity: Cell Division and Inheritance | Microscopes let chromosomes be seen dividing; DNA sequencing reads genes letter by letter. | Knowing how genes are inherited led to genetic tests and to breeding crops with chosen traits. |
| The Big Bang and the Universe | Telescopes, spectroscopes and radio antennas measured red shifts and the microwave background. | Relativity, needed to understand the universe, is built into satellite navigation, whose clocks must be corrected for it. |
| Energy Flow and Climate Change | Satellites, ice-core drills and weather stations built a global record of temperature and carbon dioxide. | Knowing how carbon dioxide absorbs infrared led to infrared sensors that measure carbon dioxide in rooms and glasshouses. |
| Newton’s Laws of Motion | Light gates, data loggers and slow-motion cameras measure motion far better than a stopwatch. | Newton’s laws are used to design seatbelts, airbags, crumple zones and rockets. |
A loop back: data loggers measured rates precisely, which improved catalysts, which made catalytic converters; testing converters needed new gas sensors. Engineers need the science to know what is possible; scientists need engineers to build instruments that can measure it.
Case study
Technology enabled the science when a horn antenna built for satellite communication picked up the glow. Science shaped technology when COBE, WMAP and Planck were designed for the sole job of measuring it, each more finely than the last. Penzias and Wilson cleaned the antenna to rule out a fault in their own equipment before believing the signal came from the sky. In space, a satellite escapes the atmosphere, which absorbs and adds microwaves, and can scan the whole sky. The case shows a prediction (1948) waiting for technology, and a lucky find (1964) that mattered because a prediction was ready to explain it.
Technology and discovery cards (pairs)
| Cards | Technology | And a way the new science fed back into technology |
|---|---|---|
| G and A | Microscopes with finely ground lenses | Germ theory led to sterilising and to vaccines. |
| D and J | X-ray crystallography | Knowing DNA’s structure led to DNA sequencing and genetic tests. |
| E and L | The spectroscope | Line spectra led to fluorescent lamps, LEDs and lasers. |
| B and H | Radio telescopes | Pulsars and the microwave background set designs for new radio receivers and satellites. |
| K and F | Ice-core drills | Ancient climate records test the climate models used to plan for the future. |
| I and C | DNA sequencing machines | Gene comparisons guide conservation breeding of threatened species. |
A quick three-level guide
| Move | Working towards | At standard | Beyond |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology to science | names a technology without its effect on science | explains what a technology let science observe or measure | explains why the science could not have happened without it |
| Science to technology | names a gadget | links a technology to the science it depends on | traces a full loop, back to new science |
| Engineering | treats design as guesswork | describes trade-offs an engineer weighs | explains how scientists and engineers set each other’s goals |
In the mini-lesson, a filament globe and most LEDs give a continuous spectrum; a fluorescent tube gives bright lines from the mercury vapour inside it. Helium was named from lines in the Sun’s spectrum in 1868, decades before it was found on Earth.